• Home
  • BVR and IP Valuation
  • IP Value Products
  • Your Account
    • Checkout
  • ktMine
  • Free IP Value Wire
  • Contact BVR
RSS Subscribe RSS

BVR's IP Management & Valuation Wire

News and best practices on valuing intellectual property

District Court Judge offers specific amounts that fit the terms criteria for “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory”

Written by Randy on May 3, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, damages, IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research, licensing, Patent Litigation, royalties-reasonable, royalty, software patent

Standard-setting organizations establish rules that govern the ownership of IP rights that apply to the standards they adopt. Companies that help establish the criteria gain an advantage in having their technology included in standards; therefore, one rule commonly adopted is that any patent that applies to a standard can only be licensed on “fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

White paper analyzes virtual reality space

Written by Randy on April 18, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research

Virtual reality is an esoteric realm not too many valuation analysts will enter, at least professionally. (As oxymoronic as it sounds, virtual reality is gaining substance. Now it has its own, increasingly popular, currency.  See Bitcoin.) IPValueWire located a white paper that might prove to be instructional for analyzing the virtual reality space, laying out the [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Funai to buy Lexmark technology

Written by Randy on April 11, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: intellectual property M&A, investing in IP, IP value comparables & research, Patents

Lexmark International, Inc. has agreed to sell over 1,500 inkjet printing patents to Funai Electric for $100M. The purchase includes all outstanding shares of Lexmark and is expected to close mid-2013. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments on this post

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Court says lone settlement agreement cannot support plaintiff’s damages theory

Written by Randy on April 10, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, damages, Daubert hearing, expert witness, IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research, licensing, Patent Litigation, royalties-reasonable

After AVM sued Intel for infringing on one of its patents, its expert established reasonable royalty damages between $150 million and $300 million “or more.” Intel filed a Daubert motion to exclude the testimony. Earlier, a federal court stated that it was inclined to rule in Intel’s favor but wanted to hear from the expert in person [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Details of the lawsuit-settling Dupont and Monsanto cross-license agreement released

Written by Randy on April 3, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, infringement lawsuits, IP value comparables & research, licensing, Patent Litigation, royalties-reasonable, royalty

On March 26, DuPont and Monsanto announced financial terms of the technology cross-licensing agreements that also settled their patent and antitrust lawsuits relating to Monsanto’s Round-Up® resistant soybean seeds. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments on this post

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Judge reduces damages in Apple v. Samsung, setting the floor at $598M, and offers some guidance to expert witnesses

Written by Randy on March 4, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, damages and lost profits valuations, design, infringement lawsuits, IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research, Patent Litigation, Patents

On March 1, US District Court Judge Lucy Koh ruled that Samsung Electronics should pay Apple adjusted damages of $598 million, down from the jury’s award of just over $1 billion. (A jury found that 14 Samsung products had violated Apple patents.) The restating of the damages was due to two factors: 1) the jury [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Scotiabank rethinks value of Blackberry patents

Written by Randy on February 28, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: intellectual property M&A, investing in IP, IP value comparables & research, Patents

Scotiabank, the third largest bank in Canada, has revised its opinion of the value of Blackberry’s patent portfolio after reviewing IAM Magazine’s US Patent 100. A report issued by Gus Papageorgiou states the case: Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments on this post

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

MIPS sale of patents to Bridge Crossing is worthy of analysis

Written by Randy on February 22, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: investing in IP, ip monetization, IP value comparables & research, Patents

Michael D. Friedman, Ocean Tomo’s Head of Investment Banking, is touting the sale for $350 million by MIPS to Bridge Crossing, LLC all of its rights, title and interest in 498 U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications as a transaction analysts should study as a free-market IP play, as unlike other headline-grabbing deals, MIPS [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Judge Posner again takes aim at experts’ patent damages calculations

Written by Randy on February 19, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: commercial litigation, damages, damages and lost profits valuations, expert witness, IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research, Patent Litigation

In his crusade to “fix” the U.S. patent system, Judge Richard Posner (7th Circuit) wants federal courts to use the two most ready tools at their disposal: the appointment of neutral damages experts and the application of a more precise calculus of damages. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Amazon granted patent for secondary marketplace for used digital rights

Written by Randy on February 7, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: intellectual property, ip monetization, IP ownership, IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research, Patents

Amazon has been granted  a patent for an “electronic marketplace” where owners who purchased IP rights to digital content can resell those rights. The company originally filed for the patent in 2009. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments on this post

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Next Page »

  • Recent Posts

    • Rovio announces it will begin publishing games developed by third parties
    • Blogger tries humor to implore the courts come to grips with software patents
    • Michael Jordan’s infringement lawsuit tarnished the reputation of defendant, so new suit says
    • U.S. Supreme Court decides for Monsanto and its patent on weed-killer resistant soybean seeds
    • Disney’s attempt to trademark a cultural holiday runs into social media wall
  • Blogroll

    • Ian McClure’s IP Prospective
    • Intellectual Property Watch
    • IP Think Tank’s Think IP Strategy
    • IPCloseUp
    • IPLawAlert
    • IPMetrics blog
    • Law 360’s Intellectual Property Law
    • Mike Moberly's Business IP blog
    • Mission Intangible!
    • Patently-O
  • Enter your email address:

  • Categories

    • bankruptcy
    • best practices
    • brand value
    • business combinations
    • case law analysis
    • Chief Intellectual Property Officer
    • CLE
    • commercial litigation
    • copyright values
    • CPE opportunities
    • customer relationships value
    • damages
    • damages and lost profits valuations
    • Daubert hearing
    • design
    • design patents
    • early stage IP
    • EPO
    • expert witness
    • fair value accounting
    • financial reporting for IP
    • infringement lawsuits
    • intangible property
    • intellectual property
    • intellectual property M&A
    • investing in IP
    • ip monetization
    • IP ownership
    • IP strategy
    • IP valuation research
    • IP value comparables & research
    • ITC
    • legislation
    • licensing
    • Patent Litigation
    • Patents
    • policy
    • purchase price allocation
    • relief-from-royalty
    • reputation
    • royalties-reasonable
    • royalty
    • security
    • software patent
    • technology transfer
    • trade dress
    • Trade Secrets
    • trademark
    • trademark infringement
    • transfer pricing
    • Uncategorized
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office
    • USPTO
  • Blogroll

    • Ian McClure’s IP Prospective
    • Intellectual Property Watch
    • IP Think Tank’s Think IP Strategy
    • IPCloseUp
    • IPLawAlert
    • IPMetrics blog
    • Law 360’s Intellectual Property Law
    • Mike Moberly's Business IP blog
    • Mission Intangible!
    • Patently-O

Admin Login

Powered by frugal


Copyright © 2013 BVR's IP Management & Valuation Wire