• Home
  • BVR and IP Valuation
  • IP Value Products
  • Your Account
    • Checkout
  • ktMine
  • Free IP Value Wire
  • Contact BVR
RSS Subscribe RSS

BVR's IP Management & Valuation Wire

News and best practices on valuing intellectual property

District Court Judge offers specific amounts that fit the terms criteria for “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory”

Written by Randy on May 3, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, damages, IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research, licensing, Patent Litigation, royalties-reasonable, royalty, software patent

Standard-setting organizations establish rules that govern the ownership of IP rights that apply to the standards they adopt. Companies that help establish the criteria gain an advantage in having their technology included in standards; therefore, one rule commonly adopted is that any patent that applies to a standard can only be licensed on “fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Court says lone settlement agreement cannot support plaintiff’s damages theory

Written by Randy on April 10, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, damages, Daubert hearing, expert witness, IP valuation research, IP value comparables & research, licensing, Patent Litigation, royalties-reasonable

After AVM sued Intel for infringing on one of its patents, its expert established reasonable royalty damages between $150 million and $300 million “or more.” Intel filed a Daubert motion to exclude the testimony. Earlier, a federal court stated that it was inclined to rule in Intel’s favor but wanted to hear from the expert in person [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Details of the lawsuit-settling Dupont and Monsanto cross-license agreement released

Written by Randy on April 3, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, infringement lawsuits, IP value comparables & research, licensing, Patent Litigation, royalties-reasonable, royalty

On March 26, DuPont and Monsanto announced financial terms of the technology cross-licensing agreements that also settled their patent and antitrust lawsuits relating to Monsanto’s Round-Up® resistant soybean seeds. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments on this post

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

So far, the Nash Bargaining Solution is no stand-alone substitute for the 25% rule-of-thumb

Written by Randy on February 5, 2013 - 1 Comment
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, damages, damages and lost profits valuations, expert witness, IP valuation research, licensing, Patent Litigation, Patents, royalties-reasonable

Uniloc put to rest the 25% rule-of-thumb. Assuming the problem is the “of-thumb” nature of the 25% rule, seeking more rigorous proof, plaintiffs in patent infringement cases have tried turning to the Nash Bargaining Solution as a mathematical construct for calculating damages. So, how’s that going for them? Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare [...]

Read more »

1 Comment

Royalty rates in pharma deals

Written by Randy on January 25, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: IP valuation research, Patents, royalties-reasonable, royalty

A recent article in HeraldOnline quoted a Biopharma study and proclaimed the average royalty rate for deals with a pharma licensee to be between 11.74 to 14.9%, a report that was echoed elsewhere in the lay press. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments on this [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Damages witnesses need to use “reliable” valuation methods

Written by Randy on January 23, 2013 - 0 Comments
Categories: commercial litigation, damages, damages and lost profits valuations, IP value comparables & research, licensing, Patent Litigation, Patents, royalties-reasonable, royalty

Damages witnesses justifying a reasonable royalty should bag the entire market value rule entirely and make sure any licenses submitted as evidence are, indeed, comparable.  Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments on this post

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

What is a reasonable RAND royalty rate and range?

Written by Randy on December 17, 2012 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, commercial litigation, Daubert hearing, IP valuation research, royalties-reasonable, royalty

To ensure sophisticated electronic devices all work together, global standards-setting organizations (such as the International Telecommunications Union and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) require member companies to license essential patents at “reasonable and non-discriminatory rates,” or RAND. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on Facebookshare via RedditShare with StumblersTweet about itSubscribe to the comments [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Moving marketing intangibles from a higher to a lower tax state is under international scrutiny

Written by Randy on December 12, 2012 - 0 Comments
Categories: best practices, IP value comparables & research, royalties-reasonable, royalty, transfer pricing

The transfer of intangible property from one enterprise to an affiliate resident in a different country can significantly reduce the tax burden of a company. Conversely, such transfers reduce the tax revenues in countries where higher tax rates are being avoided. Countries on the short end are attempting to expose the transfer of the intangibles [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Federal Circuit: Again, Georgia-Pacific is not a rule

Written by Randy on December 10, 2012 - 0 Comments
Categories: case law analysis, damages, damages and lost profits valuations, IP valuation research, Patent Litigation, royalties-reasonable

In still another decision, Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding, 2012 LEXIS 21200 (Oct. 12, 2012), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reaffirmed that the 25% rule of thumb is a “fundamentally flawed tool for determining a baseline royalty rate” in patent infringement cases, citing its recent opinion in Uniloc [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

What are cost sharing arrangements (CSAs)?

Written by Randy on December 2, 2012 - 0 Comments
Categories: royalties-reasonable, royalty, transfer pricing

Cost sharing arrangements (CSAs) permit all foreign profits derived from exploiting developed intellectual property (IP) to be earned by foreign subsidiaries. CSAs are tax planning tools because foreign tax rates often are materially lower than the U.S. corporate tax rate of 35%, one of the highest in the world. Bookmark on DeliciousDigg this postRecommend on [...]

Read more »

Share your thoughts...

Next Page »

  • Recent Posts

    • Rovio announces it will begin publishing games developed by third parties
    • Blogger tries humor to implore the courts come to grips with software patents
    • Michael Jordan’s infringement lawsuit tarnished the reputation of defendant, so new suit says
    • U.S. Supreme Court decides for Monsanto and its patent on weed-killer resistant soybean seeds
    • Disney’s attempt to trademark a cultural holiday runs into social media wall
  • Blogroll

    • Ian McClure’s IP Prospective
    • Intellectual Property Watch
    • IP Think Tank’s Think IP Strategy
    • IPCloseUp
    • IPLawAlert
    • IPMetrics blog
    • Law 360’s Intellectual Property Law
    • Mike Moberly's Business IP blog
    • Mission Intangible!
    • Patently-O
  • Enter your email address:

  • Categories

    • bankruptcy
    • best practices
    • brand value
    • business combinations
    • case law analysis
    • Chief Intellectual Property Officer
    • CLE
    • commercial litigation
    • copyright values
    • CPE opportunities
    • customer relationships value
    • damages
    • damages and lost profits valuations
    • Daubert hearing
    • design
    • design patents
    • early stage IP
    • EPO
    • expert witness
    • fair value accounting
    • financial reporting for IP
    • infringement lawsuits
    • intangible property
    • intellectual property
    • intellectual property M&A
    • investing in IP
    • ip monetization
    • IP ownership
    • IP strategy
    • IP valuation research
    • IP value comparables & research
    • ITC
    • legislation
    • licensing
    • Patent Litigation
    • Patents
    • policy
    • purchase price allocation
    • relief-from-royalty
    • reputation
    • royalties-reasonable
    • royalty
    • security
    • software patent
    • technology transfer
    • trade dress
    • Trade Secrets
    • trademark
    • trademark infringement
    • transfer pricing
    • Uncategorized
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office
    • USPTO
  • Blogroll

    • Ian McClure’s IP Prospective
    • Intellectual Property Watch
    • IP Think Tank’s Think IP Strategy
    • IPCloseUp
    • IPLawAlert
    • IPMetrics blog
    • Law 360’s Intellectual Property Law
    • Mike Moberly's Business IP blog
    • Mission Intangible!
    • Patently-O

Admin Login

Powered by frugal


Copyright © 2013 BVR's IP Management & Valuation Wire